Close-Focus Wide-Angle (CFWA)

Also known as: CFWA, close-focus wide-angle, wide-angle macro (WAM)
Category: Photography technique
Related techniques: Wide-angle photography, Macro photography, Split/over-under photography

Overview

Close-focus wide-angle (CFWA) is a technique in which the photographer uses a wide-angle lens — typically a fisheye or ultra-wide rectilinear — and positions the camera as close as possible to a relatively small foreground subject, often only centimeters from the dome port. The result is a dramatic image that fills a large portion of the frame with the near subject while simultaneously capturing the environment, background water, distant reef, divers, or sunlight in the remaining “negative space.” The technique produces images with a sense of depth, scale, and environmental context that neither pure macro nor traditional wide-angle photography can achieve on their own ([1]).

As Mike Veitch described it in his 2011 Wetpixel tutorial “The Near and Far”: “close focus wide angle (CFWA for short) is the term used for a style of photograph involving a very wide angle lens and getting as close to a subject as possible.” He explained that “the great thing about most wide angle lenses is the fact they are capable of focusing mere centimeters away from the end of the port. What does this mean to the underwater shooter? Simple, you can fill half the frame with your main subject and have plenty of room to enhance the ‘negative space’ with another subject to maximize the impact of the photo” ([2]).

The closely related term “wide-angle macro” (WAM) is sometimes used interchangeably with CFWA, though WAM more specifically refers to using wide-angle optics to photograph truly macro-sized subjects at high magnification within a wide-angle scene. Douglas Seifert popularized the WAM abbreviation when describing images made with the INON Micro Semi-Fisheye Relay Lens UFL-MR130 EFS60 (commonly known as the “insect-eye” or “bug-eye” lens), which he used to land DIVE Magazine’s November 2010 cover. Eric Cheng noted that “Douglas always refers to it as the ‘WAM,’ for wide-angle macro” ([3]).

History

Early Roots

CFWA is not a new technique. As Alex Mustard noted in his influential 2010 article “Thoughts on Mini Domes,” small dome ports — the essential enabler of CFWA — had a “small, but loyal following” long before they became commercially available. He wrote that “Several of my friends in BSoUP have been using them almost exclusively for the last 20 years or more. Which is how I was introduced to them.” This dates the technique’s roots in the UK to at least the late 1980s in the film era. Mustard himself used a custom-made mini-dome on his Subal F100 film housing ([4]).

Mustard provided an important historical correction: “all the early dome ports were mini-domes. Big domes were too expensive and difficult to make. And they weren’t called mini-domes back then, simply domed portholes (port is an abbreviation of porthole, by the way) as they were the only size available. The innovation photographers wanted back then was actually to make them bigger, to overcome some of their optical issues. Photographers getting over-excited about mini-domes as the latest invention should take note!” ([5]).

In his 2014 Nauticam 140mm dome review, Mustard traced dome port history further back: “In the early 1960s both Schulke and Starck pioneered the use of hemi-spherical domes, independently. Realising the limitation of their small domes sourced from boat compasses, they dreamed of larger domes if only they could be made” ([6]).

The Nikonos 15mm lens, combined with its close-focus capability, was a foundational CFWA tool in the film era. Veitch noted that “with a rectilinear lens such as a Nikon 12-24mm (and diopter) or the classic Nikonos 15mm, it’s possible to get 15cm from the lens” ([7]).

The Digital CFWA Revolution (2009–2012)

The real explosion of CFWA came with the convergence of three factors in the late 2000s:

  1. The Tokina 10-17mm fisheye zoom became the essential CFWA lens for DX (APS-C) format cameras. Its ability to focus very close to the dome port, combined with the zoom range to control field of view, made it the most versatile option. Barry Guimbellot explained the appeal: “Marty Snyderman showed me the Tokina 10-17 mm lens he purchased and then let me try it on my camera. Instantly, I was sold on the lens as wide angle photography is my passion.” Adding a 1.4x teleconverter (typically the Kenko 1.4x) extended the working distance while maintaining close focus, a combination championed by Mustard and widely adopted. Guimbellot noted that the teleconverter gave “more working distance when shooting timid creatures” and “gives me the full range of the lens, instead of only working the 17mm side” ([8], [9]).

  2. Commercial mini-dome ports arrived from multiple manufacturers almost simultaneously in early 2010. As Mustard observed: “Right now, commercial mini-domes seem like London buses. You wait ages for one to turn up and then three come along at once. They are now available in a range of flavours from Aquatica to Zen!” Key products included:

    • Zen 100 dome — Used by Mustard for his comparative tests ([10])
    • Aquatica Mini Dome 100 — Announced March 24, 2010 with BK-7 coated glass, 100mm diameter, specifically designed for the Nikon 10.5mm, Sigma 10mm, and Tokina 10-17mm fisheyes. Priced at $699, rated to 90m/300ft ([11])
    • Nauticam 4.33” acrylic mini dome — Released mid-2010 as a “small acrylic dome port for close focus wide-angle and travel use” ([12])
    • UnderWater Camera Stuff 5” modular domes — Released April 2011 in two versions tuned for specific lenses: one for the Tokina 10-17mm/Nikon 16mm, another for the Canon/Sigma 15mm. Available for $350 with deluxe shade or $300 with standard shade, compatible with Ikelite housings ([13])
  3. Barry Guimbellot’s DIY mini-dome article on Wetpixel in March 2010 showed that photographers could build their own CFWA dome ports for a fraction of commercial prices. Guimbellot designed and machined a small dome for his Nexus housing after finding that his “large dome port would not let me get as close as I wanted for shooting close focus wide angle. Even more frustrating was the price of a small dome port.” He researched the nodal point of the Tokina lens and designed “what I thought to be the perfect ratio of port diameter and arc radius for the lens curvature,” machining it with Kress Technologies in Dallas. The dome could be purchased for $360 including lens shade. Guimbellot used it to photograph “3 inch nudibranchs, but still have the DOF to render a diver in the background” ([14]).

Martin Edge’s fourth edition of The Underwater Photographer (2010), reviewed on Wetpixel by Steve Williams, devoted new sections specifically to CFWA. Williams noted: “There has been a revival of interest recently in Close Focus Wide Angle (CFWA) and super macro, the increased awareness of both techniques the result of equipment improvements that make it easier now for photographers to attempt” ([15]).

At DEMA 2011, Mustard delivered a presentation titled “Domes without the Drone” at the Imaging Resource Center, covering “the practical pros and cons of various types of domes available, together with situations in which one type may be preferable over another.” He later noted he “was asked to talk on the subject of mini-domes” and aimed to “make the talk interesting and accessible as well as help people understand this popular accessory” ([16]).

The Full-Frame Era (2014–2018)

The transition to full-frame cameras introduced new challenges for CFWA. As Mustard explained in his comprehensive 2014 review of the Nauticam 140mm dome: “The bigger your sensor the bigger your dome port needs to be to give good corner sharpness with wide angle lenses underwater… mini domes are troublesome on full frame cameras. The main problem is that the corners of the frame go completely blurred.” He determined that “140-150mm (approx. 5.5-6”) is the sensible lower limit with a fisheye on full frame,” noting he had “long concluded” this and commissioned a custom 150mm acrylic dome in 2010 which remained an active part of his kit ([17]).

Mustard documented the relationship between sensor format and dome size requirements: “Smaller formats use shorter focal length lenses (with more depth of field) for the same angle of coverage.” He used different dome sizes for each system: “I use an 80mm dome with the 8mm on the 2x crop, a 100mm port with the 10mm on the 1.5x crop and a 150mm port with the 15mm on the 1x crop. This for me is the lower limit of acceptable quality” ([18]).

The Nikonos RS 13mm fisheye lens conversion project, led by Andrej Belic and completed in September 2012, provided another CFWA option. Belic adapted the legendary underwater lens (originally produced 1992-1996) to work electronically with modern Nikon DSLRs in Nauticam, Seacam, and Subal housings. The lens was “known as the epitome of optical excellence in underwater wide-angle photography” and its built-in small dome front element functioned similarly to a mini-dome, making it naturally suited to CFWA. Borut Furlan later refined the conversion with a completely new approach for Seacam housings in 2014 ([19], [20]).

By 2021, Mustard was still using the converted Nikonos 13mm for CFWA: “I use it when I don’t have my Nikonos 13mm with me, and value a very close focus view over ultimate image quality” (referring to his use of the 4” dome as an alternative) ([21]).

Modern CFWA: Wet Lenses and Conversion Optics (2018–present)

The introduction of Nauticam’s MWL-1 (Macro Wide-Angle Lens) in October 2018 represented a paradigm shift for CFWA. Priced at $1,850, the MWL-1 was a water-contact conversion lens designed to be used with a 60mm full-frame equivalent macro lens, providing a 150-degree field of view. It could “focus from the lens’ front element to infinity” and could “be attached and removed underwater” via either an M67 flip mount or bayonet fitting. The key innovation: “Ultra wide angle and macro perspectives are now available on the same dive — even with full frame DSLR systems” ([22]).

Jack Connick’s 2019 field review for Wetpixel praised the MWL-1 as “a game-changing wet mount wide angle lens.” He noted it “focuses down onto its very small dome for CFWA” and described it as enabling “a great opportunity to tell a story, creating a series of photos with different points of view.” Connick tested it with a Nikon D850 in Indonesia, calling it “the real hidden beauty of the MWL, its small size for travel and diving. It can replace a large 9” glass dome port, 90 mm extension, zoom gear, and large camera lens!” He recommended f/16 for optimal performance, consistent with Nauticam’s recommendation ([23]).

In January 2021, Mustard and Adam Hanlon devoted a Wetpixel Live episode to “Mini Dome Port Primer,” responding to a community discussion thread, covering “small dome ports’ pros and cons” and noting they “offer some unique creative possibilities, reduced cost, and portability advantages, and have limitations that should also be considered” ([24]).

In June 2021, Mustard and Hanlon devoted another Wetpixel Live episode to “Wide Angle Macro Tools,” discussing the gear for “what may well be the next trend in underwater photography: Close Focus Wide Angle” and “the competing requirements of having a system that provides optically acceptable results, can focus very close, but is small enough to allow strobes to be positioned to light subjects very close to the port” ([25]).

The Nauticam EMWL (Extended Macro Wide-Angle Lens), introduced in late 2020, pushed WAM capabilities further with a modular system of interchangeable objective lenses (60-degree, 110-degree, 130-degree, and from 2022, 160-degree). Mustard reviewed the 160-degree objective in September 2022, writing that it “is designed for extreme WAM (Wide Angle Macro) imagery, where a small subject is photographed at macro levels of magnification, but within a wide angle scene.” He found that the 160-degree lens “simply makes the EMWL better at what it is designed for” with “excellent” sharpness, producing the “famous ‘bug-eye’ view” while enabling CFWA images at slightly longer distances. He also tested it for “acceptable quality CFWA images in addition to its party-trick WAM images” and was pleased with the results ([26]).

The Laowa 15mm f/4 Wide Angle Macro lens, supported by Seacam port solutions from 2019, offered a different approach — a rectilinear wide-angle lens with true 1:1 macro capability built in, eliminating the need for conversion lenses. Seacam produced a “unique port for the Laowa 15mm f/4 Wide Angle Macro” featuring “a small dome with a built-in shade” ([27]).

Equipment

Lenses

The choice of lens is the most critical equipment decision for CFWA. Key options documented in the Wetpixel archive include:

Dome Ports

Mini-dome ports (approximately 100mm / 4” diameter, typically hemispherical) are the key hardware enabler for CFWA. As Mustard defined them: “A mini-dome is small dome port usually around 100mm or 4” in diameter and typically hemispherical in shape” ([43]).

Advantages documented by Mustard:

Drawbacks Mustard documented extensively:

([44], [45])

Dome size by format (from Mustard’s 2014 review):

FormatCrop FactorFisheye Focal LengthMinimum Dome Size (Mustard)
Micro Four Thirds2x8mm80mm (3.15”)
APS-C (DX)1.5x10-10.5mm100mm (4”)
Full Frame (FX)1x15mm140-150mm (5.5-6”)

([46])

Key mini-dome products:

Lighting

Strobe positioning is the most technically demanding aspect of CFWA. As Veitch explained: “In traditional wide angle photography, we set our strobe arms out wide to ‘edge light’ the subject while avoiding backscatter. If you were to move in close and take a photo without adjusting the strobes you may be surprised just how dark that photo turns out! In close focus photography, having the arms out wide doesn’t work. With the dome scant inches from the subject, the light from the strobes would miss the subject entirely” ([55]).

Veitch prescribed: “A superior way of lighting a close subject is to bring the strobes right in to the dome port and pointing them slightly outside of parallel to the lens. Not only does this avoid shadows, it also cuts down on backscatter around the edge of the frame. If using a fisheye lens, be careful when using this technique, it’s important to bring the strobes behind the plane of the camera in order to avoid strobe flare” ([56]).

Mustard identified this close strobe positioning as the “real advantage” of mini-domes: “their small size makes it much easier to position (small) strobes close to the port. This greatly improves the quality of lighting we can achieve in true close focus wide angle (CFWA) and wide angle macro (WAM) shots” ([57]).

Fiber-optic snoots offered additional precision for CFWA lighting. Eric Cheng documented an innovative system at Blue Heron Bridge in September 2010, where a diver named Shen from Reef Photo & Video had attached “LocLine arms” to the ends of Ikelite strobes with “fiber optic cables” inside — a system Cheng called “Ingenious!” The rig was specifically described as “his close-focus wide-angle rig” ([58]).

The Retra Reflector, reviewed by Mike Bartick in 2020, was noted as maintaining “excellent coverage, making it perfectly suited for macro, wide, and close focus-wide angle techniques” while boosting strobe output by “2/3rds to a full stop” and producing faster recycling times ([59]).

For the EMWL system, Mustard noted a unique approach: “I use my strobes as my focus light with the EMWL because their aiming light turns off for a second after firing so it does not show up in my images” and that “my strobes are on very low power because they are so close to the subject” ([60]).

Technique

Subject Selection

CFWA subjects are distinctly different from macro subjects. Veitch listed the ideal characteristics: “a readily approachable medium sized object such as an anemone, soft coral, or certain species of fish such as lionfish or crocodilefish.” He emphasized that “one of my favourite subjects are anemones with their myriad of colours and personable resident clownfish. The size of anemones is perfect for CFWA and when they are balled up in feeding position they make for a brilliant foreground. Other subjects that lend themselves well to CFWA photos include soft corals, sea fans, and hard corals” ([61]).

Mustard demonstrated how small subjects can be with the right equipment: he photographed a sea urchin “smaller than half a tennis ball, with the Tokina 10-17mm on its widest setting at 10mm, yet I was able to fill the frame with it” using a mini-dome ([62]). Guimbellot photographed “3 inch nudibranchs, but still have the DOF to render a diver in the background” with his custom dome and 1.4x teleconverter ([63]).

For the EMWL, Mustard noted the key was “the right subject”: non-moving and territorial subjects that “will allow a close approach.” Successful subjects included “nudibranchs, shrimps, crabs, red Irish lords (a sculpin that looks a lot like a small scorpionfish), and sea anemones” ([64]).

In UK cold waters, Mark Kirkland found small domes ideal for CFWA “as I’m shooting the UK which means lower vis and smaller subjects,” demonstrating catshark images that he believed could not have been achieved with a larger dome ([65]).

Composition: The “Near and Far”

The defining compositional principle of CFWA is the “near and far” approach — a compelling foreground subject paired with a background element. Veitch recommended shooting vertically: “When shooting vertically, there is a whole lot of blue to work with. The blue background in and of itself is a nice complement to a colourful subject but it also lends itself very well to additional elements. Two of the easiest elements to add to the background are sun rays or a diver silhouette” ([66]).

Veitch offered a practical tip for combining CFWA with pelagic action: “One thing I keep in mind when I am diving in areas where ‘Mr Big’ can be found is: ‘what would make an interesting foreground?’ By knowing where a large piece of soft coral or sea fan is located, I can be in position to include it in the foreground of my photo when that manta or shark swims by. Although a shark on its own might be too small to fill the frame, I now have a two part photograph with a near and far subject. This photograph is visually more appealing than either subject would be on its own” ([67]).

Regarding how close to get, Veitch noted: “What surprises many new shooters is exactly how close you need to get to a subject to fill the frame… With the ever more popular fisheye lenses, the focus is so close that you have to be careful not to bump your subject with the dome port! Getting this close to subjects means they fill the frame enough to be THE main subject and do not suffer from distracting bits of coral around the edges” ([68]).

Exposure and Metering

Veitch emphasized metering the background separately from the subject: “When metering for the background exposure there is one thing to keep in mind: meter the background, not the subject. First, compose your photo and set your f-stop based on the distance you will be from the subject. Next, back away a touch and aim the camera at the background in order to set the shutter speed correctly. ‘Backing away’ is important due to the amount of light the main subject cuts off from the lens. This blocking will create a false reading in the camera and either under or over expose the background” ([69]).

Typical CFWA settings from the “Ask the Pros” series: f/8 to f/16, shutter speed near sync speed (1/125 to 1/200), ISO 200-400, manual strobe control. Julian Cohen recommended “f13 for full frame or f8 for crop sensor to get good depth of field, 1/125, ISO 200” as his starting point ([70]).

For the MWL-1, Connick and Nauticam recommended f/16 as optimal; “the shots soften quickly with the high-resolution D850 below that” ([71]).

For the EMWL, Mustard favored “f/18-f/20 (to maximize DoF), with the ISO around 320-640 to help capture the ambient light” and noted that “shutting the aperture makes it more of a challenge to achieve a balanced light image” so he would “favor shooting the lens on sunny days, and towards the middle of the day for maximum ambient light levels” ([72]).

The Magazine Cover Secret

Veitch offered a practical observation: “Ever wanted to get one of your photos on the cover of a dive magazine? If you look carefully at any cover of Scuba Diver Australasia magazine, the vast majority of wide angle covers feature close focus shots and they are all shot vertically! One thing a cover photo needs is a lot of space at the top of the shot and the wide view of a CFWA photo provides this perfectly. By positioning the subject in the middle to bottom third of the photo there is plenty of negative space at the top and bottom of the frame to add either a secondary far subject, or if luck is on your side, the title of a magazine!” ([73]).

Douglas Seifert’s INON “bug-eye” DIVE Magazine cover (November 2010) demonstrated this principle with a compact camera setup — a clownfish in an anemone shot with the INON UFL-MR130 EFS60 lens ([74]).

Community Discussion

The Wetpixel forum featured extensive CFWA discussions spanning many years:

Notable Practitioners

Key Articles and Publications

References

Wetpixel Live


Sources

  1. Wetpixel article, Aug 11, 2011: The Near And Far
  2. Wetpixel article, Aug 11, 2011: The Near And Far
  3. Wetpixel article, Oct 21, 2010: Inon Bug Eye Lens Produces Cover Image For Dive Magazine
  4. Wetpixel article, Mar 31, 2010: Thoughts On Mini Domes
  5. Wetpixel article, Mar 31, 2010: Thoughts On Mini Domes
  6. Wetpixel article, Nov 15, 2014: Review Nauticam 140mm Dome Port By Alex Mustard
  7. Wetpixel article, Aug 11, 2011: The Near And Far
  8. Wetpixel article, Mar 1, 2010: Diy Small Dome Port For Cfwa
  9. Wetpixel article, Mar 31, 2010: Thoughts On Mini Domes
  10. Wetpixel article, Mar 31, 2010: Thoughts On Mini Domes
  11. Wetpixel article, Mar 24, 2010: Aquatica Announces New Mini Dome 100
  12. Wetpixel article, Jul 22, 2010: New Products From Nauticam
  13. Wetpixel article, Apr 7, 2011: Underwater Camera Stuff Releases 5 Dome Ports
  14. Wetpixel article, Mar 1, 2010: Diy Small Dome Port For Cfwa
  15. Wetpixel article, Mar 30, 2010: Review The Underwater Photographer By Martin Edge
  16. Wetpixel article, Nov 15, 2011: Domes Without The Drone
  17. Wetpixel article, Nov 15, 2014: Review Nauticam 140mm Dome Port By Alex Mustard
  18. Wetpixel article, Nov 15, 2014: Review Nauticam 140mm Dome Port By Alex Mustard
  19. Wetpixel article, Oct 23, 2012: Nikonos Rs Lens Project Finalized
  20. Wetpixel article, May 22, 2014: Insight The Nikonos Rs 13mm Conversion
  21. Forum thread: What Are The Advantages Of Small Domes
  22. Wetpixel article, Oct 31, 2018: Nauticam Ships Mwl 1 Ultra Wide Conversion Lens
  23. Wetpixel article, Feb 24, 2019: Review Nauticam Mwl 1 Conversion Lens By Jack Connick
  24. Wetpixel article, Jan 8, 2021: Wetpixel Live Mini Dome Port Primer
  25. Wetpixel article, Jun 1, 2021: Wetpixel Live Wide Angle Macro Tools
  26. Wetpixel article, Sep 25, 2022: Field Review Nauticam Emwl With 160 Degree Lens By Alex Mustard
  27. Wetpixel article, May 8, 2019: Seacam Announces Lens Support For Laowa Lenses
  28. Wetpixel article, May 18, 2015: Wetpixel Asks The Pros Wide Angle Part 1
  29. Forum thread: Compact Cfwa Setup
  30. Wetpixel article, Mar 31, 2010: Thoughts On Mini Domes
  31. Forum thread: Compact Cfwa Setup
  32. Forum thread: Advise Please Port Lens Options For Close Focus Wide Angle Photography
  33. Wetpixel article, May 18, 2015: Wetpixel Asks The Pros Wide Angle Part 1
  34. Wetpixel article, Mar 31, 2010: Thoughts On Mini Domes
  35. Forum thread: What Are The Advantages Of Small Domes
  36. Wetpixel article, Oct 31, 2018: Nauticam Ships Mwl 1 Ultra Wide Conversion Lens
  37. Wetpixel article, Feb 24, 2019: Review Nauticam Mwl 1 Conversion Lens By Jack Connick
  38. Wetpixel article, Sep 25, 2022: Field Review Nauticam Emwl With 160 Degree Lens By Alex Mustard
  39. Wetpixel article, Oct 21, 2010: Inon Bug Eye Lens Produces Cover Image For Dive Magazine
  40. Wetpixel article, May 8, 2019: Seacam Announces Lens Support For Laowa Lenses
  41. Wetpixel article, Oct 23, 2012: Nikonos Rs Lens Project Finalized
  42. Forum thread: What Are The Advantages Of Small Domes
  43. Wetpixel article, Mar 31, 2010: Thoughts On Mini Domes
  44. Wetpixel article, Mar 31, 2010: Thoughts On Mini Domes
  45. Wetpixel article, Nov 15, 2014: Review Nauticam 140mm Dome Port By Alex Mustard
  46. Wetpixel article, Nov 15, 2014: Review Nauticam 140mm Dome Port By Alex Mustard
  47. Wetpixel article, Mar 31, 2010: Thoughts On Mini Domes
  48. Wetpixel article, Mar 24, 2010: Aquatica Announces New Mini Dome 100
  49. Wetpixel article, Jul 22, 2010: New Products From Nauticam
  50. Wetpixel article, Nov 15, 2014: Review Nauticam 140mm Dome Port By Alex Mustard
  51. Wetpixel article, Apr 7, 2011: Underwater Camera Stuff Releases 5 Dome Ports
  52. Forum thread: Compact Cfwa Setup
  53. Wetpixel article, Mar 1, 2010: Diy Small Dome Port For Cfwa
  54. Wetpixel article, Apr 7, 2011: Underwater Camera Stuff Releases 5 Dome Ports
  55. Wetpixel article, Aug 11, 2011: The Near And Far
  56. Wetpixel article, Aug 11, 2011: The Near And Far
  57. Wetpixel article, Mar 31, 2010: Thoughts On Mini Domes
  58. Wetpixel article, Sep 18, 2010: Fiber Optic Snoot System For Underwater Strobes
  59. Wetpixel article, Oct 12, 2020: Field Review Retra Reflector By Mike Bartick
  60. Wetpixel article, Sep 25, 2022: Field Review Nauticam Emwl With 160 Degree Lens By Alex Mustard
  61. Wetpixel article, Aug 11, 2011: The Near And Far
  62. Wetpixel article, Mar 31, 2010: Thoughts On Mini Domes
  63. Wetpixel article, Mar 1, 2010: Diy Small Dome Port For Cfwa
  64. Wetpixel article, Sep 25, 2022: Field Review Nauticam Emwl With 160 Degree Lens By Alex Mustard
  65. Forum thread: What Are The Advantages Of Small Domes
  66. Wetpixel article, Aug 11, 2011: The Near And Far
  67. Wetpixel article, Aug 11, 2011: The Near And Far
  68. Wetpixel article, Aug 11, 2011: The Near And Far
  69. Wetpixel article, Aug 11, 2011: The Near And Far
  70. Wetpixel article, May 18, 2015: Wetpixel Asks The Pros Wide Angle Part 1
  71. Wetpixel article, Feb 24, 2019: Review Nauticam Mwl 1 Conversion Lens By Jack Connick
  72. Wetpixel article, Sep 25, 2022: Field Review Nauticam Emwl With 160 Degree Lens By Alex Mustard
  73. Wetpixel article, Aug 11, 2011: The Near And Far
  74. Wetpixel article, Oct 21, 2010: Inon Bug Eye Lens Produces Cover Image For Dive Magazine
  75. Forum thread: What Are The Advantages Of Small Domes
  76. Forum thread: Compact Cfwa Setup
  77. Forum thread: Advise Please Port Lens Options For Close Focus Wide Angle Photography
  78. Wetpixel article, Mar 31, 2010: Thoughts On Mini Domes
  79. Wetpixel article, Nov 15, 2014: Review Nauticam 140mm Dome Port By Alex Mustard
  80. Wetpixel article, Sep 25, 2022: Field Review Nauticam Emwl With 160 Degree Lens By Alex Mustard
  81. Wetpixel article, Aug 11, 2011: The Near And Far
  82. Wetpixel article, Mar 1, 2010: Diy Small Dome Port For Cfwa
  83. Wetpixel article, Apr 7, 2011: Underwater Camera Stuff Releases 5 Dome Ports
  84. Wetpixel article, Oct 21, 2010: Inon Bug Eye Lens Produces Cover Image For Dive Magazine
  85. Wetpixel article, Feb 24, 2019: Review Nauticam Mwl 1 Conversion Lens By Jack Connick
  86. Wetpixel article, Oct 12, 2020: Field Review Retra Reflector By Mike Bartick
  87. Wetpixel article, Mar 30, 2010: Review The Underwater Photographer By Martin Edge
  88. Wetpixel article, Oct 23, 2012: Nikonos Rs Lens Project Finalized
  89. Wetpixel article, May 22, 2014: Insight The Nikonos Rs 13mm Conversion
  90. Wetpixel article, Apr 7, 2011: Underwater Camera Stuff Releases 5 Dome Ports
  91. Wetpixel article, Aug 11, 2011: The Near And Far
  92. Wetpixel article, Mar 31, 2010: Thoughts On Mini Domes
  93. Wetpixel article, Mar 1, 2010: Diy Small Dome Port For Cfwa
  94. Wetpixel article, Nov 15, 2014: Review Nauticam 140mm Dome Port By Alex Mustard
  95. Wetpixel article, May 18, 2015: Wetpixel Asks The Pros Wide Angle Part 1
  96. Wetpixel article, Nov 15, 2011: Domes Without The Drone
  97. Wetpixel article, Jan 8, 2021: Wetpixel Live Mini Dome Port Primer
  98. Wetpixel article, Jun 1, 2021: Wetpixel Live Wide Angle Macro Tools
  99. Source: wetpixel_live/156-wide-angle-macro-tools-for-underwater-photographers.md
  100. Wetpixel article, Feb 24, 2019: Review Nauticam Mwl 1 Conversion Lens By Jack Connick
  101. Wetpixel article, Sep 25, 2022: Field Review Nauticam Emwl With 160 Degree Lens By Alex Mustard
  102. Wetpixel article, Mar 30, 2010: Review The Underwater Photographer By Martin Edge
  103. Wetpixel article, Oct 23, 2012: Nikonos Rs Lens Project Finalized
  104. The Near and Far — Mike Veitch (2011) (article)
  105. Thoughts on Mini Domes — Alex Mustard (2010) (article)
  106. DIY Small Dome Port for CFWA — Barry Guimbellot (2010) (article)
  107. Aquatica announces new Mini Dome 100 (2010) (article)
  108. New products from Nauticam — 4.33” mini dome (2010) (article)
  109. INON bug-eye lens produces cover image for DIVE Magazine (2010) (article)
  110. Fiber optic snoot system for underwater strobes (2010) (article)
  111. Review: The Underwater Photographer by Martin Edge (2010) (article)
  112. Domes without the Drone — Alex Mustard, DEMA 2011 (article)
  113. UnderWater Camera Stuff releases 5” dome ports (2011) (article)
  114. Nikonos RS lens project finalized — Andrej Belic (2012) (article)
  115. Insight: The Nikonos RS 13mm conversion — Borut Furlan (2014) (article)
  116. Field Review: Nauticam 140mm dome — Alex Mustard (2014) (article)
  117. Wetpixel Asks the Pros: Wide-Angle Part 1 (2015) (article)
  118. Nauticam ships MWL-1 ultra wide conversion lens (2018) (article)
  119. Review: Nauticam MWL-1 by Jack Connick (2019) (article)
  120. Seacam announces lens support for Laowa lenses (2019) (article)
  121. Field Review: Retra Reflector by Mike Bartick (2020) (article)
  122. Wetpixel Live: Mini Dome Port Primer (2021) (article)
  123. Wetpixel Live: Wide Angle Macro Tools (2021) (article)
  124. Field Review: Nauticam EMWL 160 Degree Lens — Alex Mustard (2022) (article)
  125. Forum: What are the advantages of small domes? (2021) (forum)
  126. Forum: Compact CFWA setup (2023) (forum)
  127. Forum: Port/lens options for CFWA photography (2022) (forum)
  128. Wetpixel Live Ep. 59: Nauticam EMWL Unboxing (unknown)
  129. Wetpixel Live Ep. 98: EMWL Half-Term Report (unknown)
  130. Wetpixel Live Ep. 156: Wide Angle Macro Tools (unknown)
  131. Wetpixel Live Ep. 181: Nauticam Underwater Optics Explained (unknown)
  132. Wetpixel Live Ep. 183: Water Contact Optics Design (unknown)